Questionnaires

Questionnaires is used to administer certain kinds of annual, government mandated questionnaires to directors. Goal is to primarily report any interests, holdings, or ownership stakes a director may have. Performed annually, can be very long and do not change from year to year.

  • Problem

    The app was very difficult to use. Had a big learning curve. Our customers were not tech savvy which made it even more difficult to use.

  • Goal

    The app was very difficult to use. Had a big learning curve. Our customers were not tech savvy which made it even more difficult to use.

  • Constraints

    Preserving legacy app functionality.

 
 

Questionnaires consist of two parts: builder and responder. Builder is used to build a questionnaire and is used primarily by admins. Responder is viewed by directors who fill out questionnaires. I redesigned an entire app, both builder and responder.

 

Research - User Interviews

“It took my a while to get used to Diligent products. I’ve only used excel before so there was definitely learning curve. ”

“Some of the question types are confusing and it took me some time to learn how to create a list question.”

“It would be nice to be able to duplicate questions.”

Competitive analysis

I did a competitive analysis to identify the areas that could be improved in our product. I made a list of the features of three other competitors and compared it against Questionnaires.

First Iteration

I designed a first version where I redesigned the question builder experience. As well as few other updates:

• Updated UI

• Drag and drop for a new question type

• New questions are built on a page and not a modal

 

User Testing

I conducted moderated usability testing with existing customers and internal stakeholders for the first iteration. The goal was to get their feedback on a new design of Questionnaires.

Based on the test I learned that there were few usability issues. Mainly around the question creation process.

Test results

Testing uncovered few issues in the new design:

• Card is too small

• Question title/question

• Drag and drop doesn’t work properly

• Too much real estate is lost

Screenshot of a page editor interface from the University of Minnesota, highlighting accessibility issues. Includes labeled comments pointing out that the preview icon isn't clear, question titles are not noticeable as optional, the active area is too narrow, and drag-and-drop features have accessibility issues. Contains options for adding text, list, table, number, date, email, and message questions.

How to make question building less challenging

In order to improve the question building flow I designed 3 new versions. I ran a A/B tests and the overflow menu performed better than other two.

End Result

In the final design, I redesigned the question builder feature by having a button on the page instead of dragging and dropping. After testing this version, I learned that our customers wanted both options.

Prototype

Laptop displaying a finance questionnaire interface with sections for personal information and multiple questions. The layout includes a sidebar with page navigation options and Lorem Ipsum placeholder text in the main content area. The top bar has options for preview and settings.

Before and after

Responder

Responder was less complicated, it had less functionality but I used this opportunity to improve overall experience. This was the original design.

One of the features that users wanted to see was a break down by pages, so it would be easier to navigate and fill out a questionnaire.
• Based on user research and competitive analysis I designed a left side navigation to display pages and questions
• Progress bar
• Number of questions
• Moved Appendices in the navigation for an easy access

Takeways

Questionnaires was a complicated product. The team never had a designer on the team, which meant that the product was not designed with keeping with best industry practices.

Our costumers/users were not tech-savy and had a difficult time using it and getting used to it. The goal and challenge was to simplify the experience without breaking the experience of existing questionnaires. I had to find a way to make a bad experience into a good one without changing too much.

Through ought this project I learnt how to compromised on some of my decisions and choose my battles with product and dev teams.

Overall I think it was great learning experience for both design and dev teams. I learned a lot of about the design of an entire app and how all the use cases that can come with it.

 

Before and after